4 Steps To Ditching Differentiation

Reading Time: 4 minutes

How can we change the differentiation narrative?

It worries me that so many teachers still think ‘differentiation’ means they need to plan radically different activities for pupils within the same class. This not only causes unnecessary workload but it can actually hold pupils back.

Recently a group of Newly Qualified Teachers (NQTs) were telling me that everyone on their Initial Teacher Training (ITT) course had been ordered to include a ‘stretch task’ on their PowerPoints or worksheets. Without it, they would not qualify as teachers. After I had picked my jaw off the floor, I reassured them that they would be hearing no such nonsense from me, or anyone at my school. Stretch tasks would never be necessary. In fact, I actively discourage them. It’s the first step towards ditching the wrong kind of differentiation.

Here are my 4 top tips for ditching the differentiation madness.

1. Don’t bolt on challenge – build it in

At their worst, stretch tasks ask pupils to do things which are largely unrelated to the learning intention of the lesson.

I once saw a Year 7 history lesson where the teacher intended their pupils to understand the sequence of events at the Battle of Hastings. The stretch task on the board invited pupils to write and perform an interview of William the Conqueror after the battle, asking him how he thought the battle had gone.

The well-meaning teacher had clearly spent a long time thinking of a fun way for pupils to apply a bit of their new knowledge. In reality, the task really relied mostly on pupils’ ability to create a role play. I’m not saying role play never has a place in history lessons. But I would much rather that learning time was devoted to securing understanding of the historical events themselves, at least initially.

Those few who did jump ahead to the ‘stretch’ spent hardly any of the lesson learning how William the Conqueror earned his imposing title on the fields of Hastings. They left their diagrams of the battle largely unfinished, wasting a valuable dual coding opportunity that would have got the knowledge stuck in their heads. Instead, they spent a good half an hour applying fragmentary knowledge and, in their performances as William, trying out more-or-less dodgy French accents.

2. Plan for the top and scaffold from there

The simple fact is, anyone who feels the need to bolt-on a ‘stretch task’ hasn’t made the main activity sufficiently challenging. They have pitched for the middle, condescended to the bottom and stuck on something to keep the top busy. A clear sign that this mindset prevails is the stubborn persistence of the dreaded ALL/MOST/SOME outcomes.

If the teacher above had just planned for ‘all’ to understand and retain the knowledge of what happened at the Battle of Hastings, that would have been enough. ‘Some’ would have managed to do this without any further teacher intervention, besides checking they were doing what they had been asked to do. The ‘all’ and ‘most’ might have required a bit of scaffolding.

But scaffolding is often as straightforward as the teacher giving further explanation or live modelling. It can be as simple as modifying our questioning, asking one pupil in one way and another pupil in another way.

So why do so many of us feel like this isn’t enough?

3. Stop thinking differentiation = different routes through the lesson

I’ve been there, done that, filled in the lesson plan. Once upon a time I too made sure I filled those boxes: the ones marked ALL/MOST/SOME. Or LAPS/MAPS/HAPS (lower, middle and higher attaining pupils).

And let’s not forget, perhaps most time-wastingly of all: Visual/Auditory/Kinaesthetic.

Section 5 of the Teaching Standards states that teachers must adapt teaching to respond to the strengths and needs of all pupils. The key word here for me is ‘adapt’. Not ‘re-invent’ or ‘make-something-entirely-different’.

Perhaps the misconception around differentiation lies within the word itself: DIFFERENTiation. The d-word itself is enshrined in the teaching standards: Teachers must know when and how to differentiate appropriately, using approaches which enable pupils to be taught effectively.

Nowhere does it dictate that teachers must create three (or more) different versions of the same lesson. The plural on ‘approaches’ could be interpreted this way. But this could just as easily refer to adapting teaching to the topic or age group.

Instead, teachers should expect pupils to all do the same thing with some doing it better than others. After all, isn’t that what they will have to do in the end of course exams.

4. Ditch the guilt

The differentiation myth persists. Is this because some senior leaders and Ofsted inspectors still accept it as conventional wisdom with no basis in evidence? Certainly, it’s something Ofsted’s Sean Harford is keen to see disappear and recent inspector training has begun to address the issue.

But even with leaders and inspectors giving teachers ‘permission’ to rethink differentiation, the teacher martyr complex remains an impediment.

Many of us feel guilty if we aren’t flogging ourselves for our pupils. But pupils’ needs are not being met if their teachers are exhausted, having stayed up until midnight creating endless permutations of worksheets.

And finally…

To keep our workload manageable and get the best out of every pupil these are the steps we need to take:

  1. We need to stop bolting-on ‘stretch tasks’. Instead, we need to build in the challenge.
  2. We need to say no to outcomes: ALL/MOST/SOME, VAK, etc. Instead, we need to just give everyone the same success criteria and, if required, scaffold from the top down.
  3. We need to stop thinking DIFFERENTiation = different activities, worksheets, etc.
  4. We need to ditch our guilt.

Differentiation is a waste of time and a road to nowhere. It is the word itself that gets in the way of learning. The best thing to do is stop using it.

David Lowbridge-Ellis

David Lowbridge-Ellis has 15 years experience in the classroom and has been a senior leader for more than 10 of those. Deputy Head Teacher of Barr Beacon School, he is responsible for CPD, staff well-being, quality of teaching, parental engagement, equality and diversity. An SLE for assessment, he has worked with many schools, in the UK and worldwide, to slash their marking burdens whilst improving feedback to pupils. He is most passionate about leading change (the focus of his Masters degree) and, in his time away from education, writes a travel blog with his husband.

7 thoughts on “4 Steps To Ditching Differentiation

  • 15th October 2018 at 3:43 pm
    Permalink

    Splendy. What I have always thought, that some students will produce better results than others in the same lesson. Also what I was told through most ofy teaching career I was not supposed to do as differentiation meant different tasks. I hpey that exhausting idea disappears soon.

    Reply
  • 16th October 2018 at 6:46 pm
    Permalink

    The best article I have read this week, could not agree more with the idea it is suggesting. In relation to exams for a lot of subjects they all sit the same paper so differentiation should be support to allow them to access the material given not producing different material entirely. Set expectations at the top and push all to achieve it should be the only way to teach.

    Reply
    • 20th October 2018 at 10:07 am
      Permalink

      Thank you Daniel! Scaffolding is so important for those who struggle to access material but no one ever learned to ride a bike using stabilisers forever. I’m glad you agree. Let’s spread the message!

      Reply
  • 20th October 2018 at 8:20 am
    Permalink

    Agree wholeheartedly with this and with Daniel’s comments about exams. It comes down to surely the most important “tool” : to know your students. In the same way you know who needs the yellow overlay, or who needs re focusing you quickly find which ones might need the extra reassurance/ differently worded explanation or question as you circulate. Can you imagine being in a staff/jpd meeting that starts with “Now I want us all to achieve… most of you ….and of course SOME of you will be able to … “how motivating, inclusive and productive that would be!

    Reply
    • 20th October 2018 at 10:09 am
      Permalink

      Exactly Amanda! Knowing your pupils is at the heart of this.

      That staff meeting sounds horrendous, but I imagine that still happens.

      Reply
  • 29th October 2018 at 4:30 am
    Permalink

    Knowing your pupils!! Oh that’s music to my ears! Great article! Teaching is a profession with people at its core.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.